Being a social networking and inbound marketing practitioner I thought it a good idea to source recruits for a position that opened up in Medios. I posted a job opening on LinkedIn. To benchmark the success of the post I bought a job advert on a www.careerjunction.co.za.
The results were surprising and insightful. The exercise proved how much work social media marketing is, and how much planning it takes to implement a successful social campaign.
Posting the LinkedIn notice cost me $35 (about R260). The www.careerjunction.co.za post cost me R795. LinkedIn returned 16 candidates, whereas www.careerjunction.co.za retuned 28 over the same period. On a candidate per rand basis, LinkedIn is the better solution. However, the lessons I learnt made me wonder if paying less is really cheaper.
Lesson 1 – Reach
I have a modest LinkedIN account with only 40 connections. Yet my job offer was received and reacted upon by a range of people that I have no direct connection with.
The problem with the reach is that half the people who approached me were in other countries.
Another problem I encountered was the level of candidates that applied. I don’t want to sell myself short, but I should have been applying to work for some of these people. Very, very senior people applied for a relatively junior job. This leads me to lesson two.
Lesson 2 – Be very specific
My biggest mistake on LinkedIn was not being specific enough. Unlikely candidates applied for the job, because they felt they had something to offer.
Lesson 3 – Chancers
Either people don’t read, pad their online profiles or have a fire-and-forget attitude. I received many applications from people who should have known that they aren’t ideal candidates. I got the impression that many who aren’t seriously seeking employment send their CVs on the off chance that there may be something better on offer.
By contrast the people who replied to the www.careerweb.co.za advertisement were seriously looking for a job. There will still chancers, but these were CV – padders who were trying to land a job they weren’t experienced enough for.
Conclusion
On average the applicants from the professional site were a lot better matched to my requirements. The reason for this is twofold: They were seeking the type of job I was offering, and the site forces the advertiser to include some details to filter the advertisement.
In the end I interviewed nine candidates. Four came from the professional site, two from LinkedIn and three from other sources. All three shortlisted candidates came from the purpose-built recruitment site.
For me the final lesson is obvious. LinkedIn may well be a source of candidates when recruiting, but you have to be careful and prepared to sift through a lot of false starts. The better option is simply to choose a purpose-built vehicle like a recruitment site. The match between need and supply is much closer.
Posted by Jacques van den Bergh for Medios Marketing Communications








